The looming deadline for adoption’s abolition.

Over the past couple of days, Thomas Jefferson has been popping up here [link] and there [link], and in reading the history concerning the man now being revisited in ways that are not pleasing to those who see him in a particular mythological light, I started thinking about the following (rhetorical and naive) question.

In the waning days of slavery, with abolitionism on the rise, and the need for societal change concerning the “peculiar institution” coming to a head (even though this was based more on economic and political rather than on humanitarian reasoning), can we imagine someone knowingly engaging in the practice, despite understanding that in a certain period of time they will have to come to terms with what they’ve done on some level? Meaning, sensing there is a change coming, and yet going through with a knowingly soon-to-be outdated practice?

Don’t answer that, it’s rhetorical.

I’ve often said that there is a difference between someone adopting in the 1950s/60s/70s, and someone adopting today. What was possible to know then is much different from what is possible to know now, in terms of source countries and world politics/economics, etc. As activism concerning adoption gains ground, and awareness of the issues at hand grows, how does this change the decision to go ahead and adopt despite what is currently possible to know? Is this worse? Less forgivable? How does this change the basic parameters of adoption, and the role of the adopter? Does this explain the newer crop of vehemently adamant adopters? Does this make our task more difficult on some level?

3 thoughts on “The looming deadline for adoption’s abolition.

  1. I have been thinking about this – the abolition of adoption and came across this quote: “You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete” by Buckminster Fuller.

    The adoption industry propaganda is like fairy dust – it blinds the world to the trafficking of children by calling them orphans and their adopters as saviors while protecting a billion dollar industry.

  2. Agree with all of the above.We are also seeing some mothers-of-loss here in Aus more vehemently ascerting that they are the products of adoption and trying to define what adoption is for adoptees!

  3. I wonder, though, if abolishing adoption will be like abolishing slavery. Slavery persists in new forms and so will the ways by which children enter adulthood without knowing any biological roots.

Adoptees, what do you think? We welcome your replies!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s